Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
3.
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia ; 21:S341-S342, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1377894

ABSTRACT

Context: Pegcetacoplan (PEG) is a C3 complement inhibitor recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). PEG was superior to eculizumab (ECU;C5-inhibitor) in improving hemoglobin levels at week 16 during the phase 3 PEGASUS trial (NCT03500549) in patients with suboptimal response to prior ECU treatment. Objective: We report on efficacy and safety of PEG and results from a post hoc time-aligned analysis based on start of PEG dosing. Design: Eighty PNH patients (≥18 years, hemoglobin levels <10.5 g/dL despite stable ECU treatment [≥3 months]) were enrolled. Following a 4-week run-in, patients were randomized (1:1) to PEG or ECU monotherapy for the randomized controlled period (RCP) through week 16, before initiating an open-label period (OLP) through week 48, where ECU patients completed a second run-in before switching to PEG monotherapy (ECU-to-PEG), and PEG patients continued PEG monotherapy (PEG-to-PEG). Key endpoints included change from baseline (CFB) in hemoglobin levels and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Timepoints were manually aligned based on start of PEG dosing (PEG-to-PEG: day 1;ECU-to-PEG: week 20) to compare changes in hemoglobin levels between groups. Results: PEG-to-PEG patients achieved sustained improvements in hemoglobin levels at week 16 through the OLP (week 48 mean hemoglobin level: 11.3 g/dL;CFB: 2.5 g/dL). ECU-to-PEG patients displayed improved hemoglobin levels during the OLP (week 48 mean hemoglobin level: 11.6 g/dL;CFB: 2.9 g/dL). Timepoint alignment demonstrated no significant difference (p=0.64) between improvements in hemoglobin levels at 28 and 48 weeks among PEG-to-PEG and ECU-to-PEG groups, respectively. Thirty percent of patients reported a serious AE, 6% possibly PEG-related. Common AEs for PEG-treated patients were injection site reactions (36%), hemolysis (24%), and diarrhea (21%). Twelve patients (15%) discontinued PEG due to AEs: 3 in RCP, 8 in OLP, 1 during follow-up, including one death due to COVID-19, unrelated to PEG. Conclusions: PEG-treated patients experienced sustained improvements in hemoglobin levels at week 48, and the safety profile of PEG was consistent with previously reported data. The treatment effect of PEG on hemoglobin levels over time was similar between PEG-to-PEG and ECU-to-PEG groups. Thus, PEG represents a new effective therapeutic option for PNH patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL